On Mon, 26 Dec 2016, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> If you can't find anyone else in pkg-gnome that wants to cater to
> your needs, then please consider rygel package orphaned.
> In that case you're free to QA upload, please set the maintainer
> field accordingly if so. I don't want to be involved an
Hello Santiago Vila,
If you can't find anyone else in pkg-gnome that wants to cater to
your needs, then please consider rygel package orphaned.
In that case you're free to QA upload, please set the maintainer
field accordingly if so. I don't want to be involved anymore.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksso
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> If you really think that a test-suite detecting an issue should
> be solved not by fixing the issue (or fixing a potential flakyness
> in the test) but rather by disabling the test
No, I don't think at all that a test-suite detecting an issue shoul
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Claiming this is RC is a bit over the top though.
Not at all unless having two CPUs becomes part of build-essential
definition, something, which, AFAIK, has not happened yet.
> If you're only out
> to ride the policy train without actually wanting to debug it yourself
Control: tags -1 - patch
Hello Santiago Vila.
Thanks for trying to contribute, but you're patch is fundamentally
flawed.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:07:28PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> tags 841098 + patch
> thanks
>
> Here is a patch. After applying it the package builds fine and without
> fa
ontrol: reopen -1
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 20:15:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:14:11 +0200
> > From: Andreas Henriksson
> > To: Santiago Vila
> > Cc: 841098-d...@bugs.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Bug#8410
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:45:24PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> If you're strongly attached to (cluttering up my maintainer view and)
> tracking every issue in the debian bug tracking system (I'd instead
> recommend you use the upstream bug tracker), then I'd welcome
> a bug report with seve
Hello Santiago Vila.
Thanks for the backtrace, it's helpful.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:16:20PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The package FTBFS (sometimes) because rygel-media-engine-test segfaults.
>
> Here is a backtrace:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7f1a1a4b3fdf in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linu
Control: reopen -1
Hi!
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 20:15:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:14:11 +0200
> From: Andreas Henriksson
> To: Santiago Vila
> Cc: 841098-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#841098: not fixed in rygel 0.32.1
Sorry, there was a typo. Here is a fixed patch.
Thanks.diff -Nru rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog
--- rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog 2016-10-18 09:21:52.0 +0200
+++ rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog 2016-10-21 13:49:26.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ryg
tags 841098 + patch
thanks
Here is a patch. After applying it the package builds fine and without failures.
Thanks.diff -Nru rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog
--- rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog 2016-10-18 09:21:52.0 +0200
+++ rygel-0.32.1/debian/changelog
The package FTBFS (sometimes) because rygel-media-engine-test segfaults.
Here is a backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f1a1a4b3fdf in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f1a1a4b540a in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2 0x7f1a1af8a4f5 in g_assertion_message () f
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:14:11PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The above mentioned upload was done as a source-only upload.
> It built successfully not only in my local environment but also on *all*
> architectures (and thus on atleast one buildd for each architecture).
>
> This is obvious
13 matches
Mail list logo
