Bug#841056: Fixing dvi2dvi

2016-12-28 Thread Christoph Biedl
Christoph Biedl wrote... > Ian Jackson wrote... > > > Is upstream contactable ? Maybe they could be persuaded to drop the > > restriction. Does anyone know if they have been asked ? > > Well, I gave it a try. The address is pretty old but at least there's > still a mail server for it, and a me

Bug#841056: Fixing dvi2dvi

2016-12-20 Thread Christoph Biedl
Ian Jackson wrote... > Is upstream contactable ? Maybe they could be persuaded to drop the > restriction. Does anyone know if they have been asked ? Well, I gave it a try. The address is pretty old but at least there's still a mail server for it, and a message was not rejected instantly. C

Bug#841056: Fixing dvi2dvi

2016-12-20 Thread Ian Jackson
(CCing the bug, #841056) Christoph Biedl writes ("Fixing dvi2dvi"): > I'd like to fix dvi2dvi which (besides a no-brainer) has a problem > | #841056 dvi2dvi: license requires package rename > > >3. The package name of the modified software must not be ``dvi2dvi'' or > >``dvi2dvi-'' where is th