Bug#839250: sysVinit support

2016-10-06 Thread Chris Lamb
Neil Williams wrote: > I thought that was standard init script behaviour, to call first with > --test and then with the options. Not heard of that before. *shrugs* > > … I previously hesitated to do that as it would be a real world > > regression for people using Debian stable; their service wou

Bug#839250: sysVinit support

2016-10-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 17:42:32 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > > We're testing this sysVinit support at the moment, seems to work at > > this end. > > Thanks. Can you elaborate on the double invokation of > start-stop-daemon? Namely, is that really needed here? I thought tha

Bug#839250: sysVinit support

2016-10-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Neil Williams wrote: > We're testing this sysVinit support at the moment, seems to work at > this end. Thanks. Can you elaborate on the double invokation of start-stop-daemon? Namely, is that really needed here? > One problem we have identified so far is that these conffiles were > removed in 19

Bug#839250: sysVinit support

2016-10-03 Thread Neil Williams
We're testing this sysVinit support at the moment, seems to work at this end. (In practice, the sysVinit file will always be installed and systemd will generate a service. The service file itself is to be included to allow admins to choose to use it directly.) One problem we have identified so far