Tianon Gravi:
> On 5 November 2016 at 09:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Cool! :)
>>
>> Should I file a bug against ftp.d.o, asking them to remove golang-1.6
>> from unstable? :)
>
> If you're willing, that sounds great! (I always end up having to
> re-read the docs any time I use the BTS for more th
On 5 November 2016 at 09:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Cool! :)
>
> Should I file a bug against ftp.d.o, asking them to remove golang-1.6
> from unstable? :)
If you're willing, that sounds great! (I always end up having to
re-read the docs any time I use the BTS for more than simply replying,
so I h
On 6 November 2016 at 05:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Tianon Gravi:
> > On 31 October 2016 at 17:50, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> >> Checking reverse dependencies...
> >> # Broken Build-Depends:
> >> golang-github-docker-go: golang-1.6-go
> >> golang-1.6-src
> >>
> >> Dependency
Tianon Gravi:
> On 31 October 2016 at 17:50, Tianon Gravi wrote:
>> Checking reverse dependencies...
>> # Broken Build-Depends:
>> golang-github-docker-go: golang-1.6-go
>> golang-1.6-src
>>
>> Dependency problem found.
>
> After that last golang-github-docker-go upload,
On 31 October 2016 at 17:50, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> golang-github-docker-go: golang-1.6-go
> golang-1.6-src
>
> Dependency problem found.
After that last golang-github-docker-go upload, we're in better shape now:
On 31 October 2016 at 17:12, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> The question is, do we backport the fixes for golang-1.6, or just remove it
> from the archive?
Looks like removal would be fairly straightforward; the only package
currently affected is "golang-github-docker-go", which could just as
well
I fixed this problem a while ago upstream for Go 1.7 (
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/15443,
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/15887). The question is, do we backport
the fixes for golang-1.6, or just remove it from the archive? I'd lean
towards the latter.
On 1 November 2016 at 08:18, Niel
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:55:37 +0200 Balint Reczey
wrote:
> Source: golang-1.6
> Version: 1.6.3-1
> Severity: important
> User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
> Usertags: pie-bindnow-20160906
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64 with extra hardening
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in
Source: golang-1.6
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: important
User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
Usertags: pie-bindnow-20160906
Justification: FTBFS on amd64 with extra hardening
Tags: patch
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64 with patched GCC and dpkg.
The reb
9 matches
Mail list logo
