Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
at the moment it's difflink.at (test number 92) that is failing for
kFreeBSD.
The test assumes "ln -L" is default behaviour, which seems to be correct
on Linux, but not on BSD, where "ln -P" seems to be default (tested on
kFreeBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD).
The attached
James Clarke writes:
> Do you think you'd be able to prepare an upload with this, please
> (experimental is fine if you want to leave unstable alone)?
I just uploaded 1.29b-2 to unstable, with more test verbosity and capture
of the regression test in the build log. I did a couple other minor
th
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-09-13 08:32, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:43:59 PM CEST Bdale Garbee wrote:
> >> Andreas Beckmann writes:
> >>
> >>> 30: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED
> >>> (numer
On 2016-09-13 08:32, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:43:59 PM CEST Bdale Garbee wrote:
>> Andreas Beckmann writes:
>>
>>> 30: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED (numeric.at:29)
>>
>> I'm unlikely to find time to investigate this soon. Help figuring
On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:43:59 PM CEST Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Andreas Beckmann writes:
>
> > 30: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED (numeric.at:29)
>
> I'm unlikely to find time to investigate this soon. Help figuring out
> what's going wrong and how to fix it wou
Andreas Beckmann writes:
> 30: --numeric-owner basic tests FAILED (numeric.at:29)
I'm unlikely to find time to investigate this soon. Help figuring out
what's going wrong and how to fix it would be appreciated.
Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: tar
Version: 1.29b-1
Severity: important
Hi,
tar FTBFS on kfreebsd-* with a test failure:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tar&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1.29b-1&stamp=1469234954
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tar&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1.29b-1&stamp=1469234573
7 matches
Mail list logo
