Bug#834714: fixed in libxslt 1.1.29-3

2017-11-06 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Monday, 6 November 2017 8:19 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Just in case, did you verify if those build problems were already > reported as FTBFS bugs in those packages? No, I didn't, but I've still got the build logs. So I'll check the BTS and see what I can do. Hugh

Bug#834714: fixed in libxslt 1.1.29-3

2017-11-05 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2017-11-05 13:27 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 05:57:24AM +, Hugh McMaster wrote: >> I've finished building libxslt's reverse dependencies both with the >> multi-arch patch and without it. > > Great, thank you! > >> Several packages failed to complete the build process in

Bug#834714: fixed in libxslt 1.1.29-3

2017-11-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 05:57:24AM +, Hugh McMaster wrote: > I've finished building libxslt's reverse dependencies both with the > multi-arch patch and without it. Great, thank you! > Several packages failed to complete the build process in some way, > but these failures were unrelated to the

Bug#834714: fixed in libxslt 1.1.29-3

2017-11-04 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi everyone, I've finished building libxslt's reverse dependencies both with the multi-arch patch and without it. Several packages failed to complete the build process in some way, but these failures were unrelated to the multi-arch change. Hugh