Hi Emilio (2016.08.31_00:35:21_+0200)
> > Would you mind if I held back for the next release, due on the 1st?
So, that is staged in git and ready to go.
It will require a 1-line patch to ocaml-re2 (inserting an std::), and
ruby-re2 should be binnmuable.
chromium-browser, libphonenumber, and hhvm
Hi Emilio (2016.08.31_00:35:21_+0200)
> > Would you mind if I held back for the next release, due on the 1st?
>
> 1st of September?
>
> That'd be fine.
Yep. Upstream does monthly snapshots, rather than releases. And seem to
be moving rather fast atm.
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.o
On 30/08/16 08:04, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Emilio (2016.08.29_09:58:46_+0200)
>> Go ahead.
>
> Would you mind if I held back for the next release, due on the 1st?
1st of September?
That'd be fine.
Emilio
Hi Emilio (2016.08.29_09:58:46_+0200)
> Go ahead.
Would you mind if I held back for the next release, due on the 1st?
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 17/08/16 00:44, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> It's already in experimental, where it has built on all release
> architectures, so:
>
> Ben file: https:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
It's already in experimental, where it has built on all release
architectures, so:
Ben file: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-re2.html
Only two reverse dependencies, whi
6 matches
Mail list logo