Bug#832934: RFS: pylucene/4.10.1+dfsg-1

2016-07-31 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 09:56:30AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I usally prefer to avoid a repack wheneveer possible, but since you already > did > it I would just remove that too. Removed both of them. > c) about additional dependencies I see added: > Build-Depends: dh-python, curl, an

Bug#832934: RFS: pylucene/4.10.1+dfsg-1

2016-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >Now (new version) actually uses liblucene4.10-java from Debian both as >Build-Depends and runtime dependency. >And that's actually why I've added more Build-Depends. > >lucene-java-4.10.1 is just there because it's in upstream tarball. >I was trying to avoid repackaging of upstream tarball

Bug#832934: RFS: pylucene/4.10.1+dfsg-1

2016-07-30 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 08:49:06AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I'm willing to sponsor this, but I have some questions/showstoppers: Thanks a lot! > > 1) licenses: some licenses are BSD, and there are some missing copyrights. > please add them (grep -Ri license and grep -Ri copyright mig

Bug#832934: RFS: pylucene/4.10.1+dfsg-1

2016-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pylucene" I'm willing to sponsor this, but I have some questions/showstoppers: 1) licenses: some licenses are BSD, and there are some missing copyrights. please add them (grep -Ri license and grep -Ri c

Bug#832934: RFS: pylucene/4.10.1+dfsg-1

2016-07-29 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pylucene" * Package name: pylucene Version : 4.10.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://lucene.apache.org/pylucene/ * License