On 26/07/16 01:32, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 16:05 CDT, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>
>> What's the bug number?
>
> There is no reported bug so far.
>
>> A binNMU to workaround an ABI break is usually the wrong approach,
>> unless there has been a SONAME bump.
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 16:05 CDT, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> What's the bug number?
There is no reported bug so far.
> A binNMU to workaround an ABI break is usually the wrong approach,
> unless there has been a SONAME bump.
libtrilinos-teuchos12 changed ABI from 12.6.3-1 to 12.6.3-2
Hi Emilio
The bug in trilinos is #830681.
There wasn't a SONAME bump, libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so was dynamically
linked against libbfd-2.26-system.so which is not allowed. This
latest of version of deal.ii is the only reverse dependency of
trilinos and only the amd64 build which I uploaded is af
On 25/07/16 22:51, Matthias Maier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu deal.ii_8.4.1-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against trilinos
> 12.6.3-2 due to ABI change"
What's the bug number? A binNMU to w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu deal.ii_8.4.1-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against trilinos 12.6.3-2
due to ABI change"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50
5 matches
Mail list logo