On 07/23/2016 01:43 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:12:16AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On 07/22/2016 11:50 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> I think the solution is to build rails on a system which still has
>>> ruby-json 1.8.3 and upload that version to archive.
>>>
>>
>>
On 07/22/2016 11:50 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think the solution is to build rails on a system which still has
> ruby-json 1.8.3 and upload that version to archive.
>
I have built rails locally without strict dependency on ruby-json. If
someone can confirm its okay to upload, I can upload it.
On 07/22/2016 11:46 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> The failure is at:
>> ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to
>> be installed
>
> I tried relaxing the requirement in rails package and build, but it
> fails to build be
On 07/22/2016 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> The failure is at:
> ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to
> be installed
I tried relaxing the requirement in rails package and build, but it
fails to build because of circular dependencies :(
signature.asc
Descri
On 07/22/2016 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The failure you quoted is about a strict dependency. Do you know if it's
> justified? The changes on ruby-json's side are fairly small. Also it
> seems that the strict dependency was dropped from the gemspec (it's not
> there anymore in version 1.0.2
On 07/22/2016 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday on IRC:
> 23:29 < lucas> long time without doing any ruby packaging, let's hope I
> didn't break the world
>
> Looks like I did :/
I guessed :)
> The failure you quoted is about a strict dependency. Do you know if it's
> justifi
6 matches
Mail list logo
