Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

Hi Niels, > Thanks for the patch! :) Thanks again for the review. :) > If the test does not need anything special from d/rules we have a > standard one Ah, good to know... Removed. > Should the regex have a "/" (or use $basename eq '.coverage'[1])? > AFAICT this would also match "foo.coverage"

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

Chris Lamb: > tags 831864 + patch > thanks > > Hi Lintian maintainers, > Hi, Thanks for the patch! :) Two minor remarks > Attached is the following: > > commit 707a5c5965f4349735e185caaf18f7af022d279f > Author: Chris Lamb > Date: Wed Aug 24 19:12:16 2016 +0100 > > c/files:

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

tags 831864 + patch thanks Hi Lintian maintainers, Attached is the following: commit 707a5c5965f4349735e185caaf18f7af022d279f Author: Chris Lamb Date: Wed Aug 24 19:12:16 2016 +0100 c/files: Warn about Python packages which ship coverage.py information. (Closes: #831864)

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

Hi, Axel Beckert wrote: > I don't know too much about doing coverage computations in Python, but > this looks wrong twice (i.e. for both packages): > > Unpacking python-rows (0.2.0-1) over (0.1.1-3) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/python-rows_0.2.0-1_all.deb (--unp

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.45 Severity: wishlist Hi, I don't know too much about doing coverage computations in Python, but this looks wrong twice (i.e. for both packages): Unpacking python-rows (0.2.0-1) over (0.1.1-3) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/python-rows_0