On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:20:16 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Hello Guillem,
> I see that this serious bug has been pending since July the 7th.
> I thought dpkg/1.18.10 was going to be uploaded to unstable very soon
> after having found the fix for this regression, but apparently
> something we
Hi,
I think I've also seen this segfault in a spurious piuparts failure
(package: xrdp, upgrade: jessie -> sid). So the bug is out in the wild,
not only in a testsuite. Luckily I saw the debian-release@ discussion
about it before digging deeper into the piuparts failure.
Andreas
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:43:19 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> I'll try to check out snapshots
> later this week to see if I can figure out when the transition actually
> happened, or if there was something else going on in the archive to
> explain it.
Thanks for your help!
Please keep us inform
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> > On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Should be contacted, perhaps?
> >
> > Sure, if you'd like to.
>
> Dear BTS owner,
> could you please investigate on what happe
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Should be contacted, perhaps?
>
> Sure, if you'd like to.
Dear BTS owner,
could you please investigate on what happened to bug #830267 on
2016-07-19T10:00 ?
Please take a look at
On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote:
I hope it's possible to investigate further, in order to find out what
really happened: needless to say, I think that the correctness of the
migration process is of great importance to the quality of Debian
testing (and, consequently, of future stable re
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:51:45 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Dear Release Team, could you please explain what I failed to understand
> > about the testing migration rules [2]?
>
> Your understanding is correct - an RC bug affecting sid and no
On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote:
In the meanwhile, dpkg/1.18.9 managed to migrate to testing [1],
despite
introducing this RC bug: I wonder how that was even possible... do the
testing migration checks skip pending RC bugs?!? a pending bug is not a
fixed bug!!! I am Cc-ing the Release
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:14:10 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote:
[...]
> On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 20:37:39 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Package: dpkg
> > Version: 1.18.9
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > dpkg fails to purge a package
[...]
>
> Hmm, thanks for the report, I know where this is coming from
Hi!
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 20:37:39 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.9
> Severity: serious
>
> dpkg fails to purge a package in our test suite, crashing with a segmentation
> fault. You can reproduce
> it by building apt and running
> test/integration/test-bug-71
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.9
Severity: serious
dpkg fails to purge a package in our test suite, crashing with a segmentation
fault. You can reproduce
it by building apt and running
test/integration/test-bug-712116-dpkg-pre-install-pkgs-hook-multiarch -
I have also included the backtrace here.
11 matches
Mail list logo
