Bug#828552: spamassassin: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-10-31 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-10-29 14:15:30 [-0700], Noah Meyerhans wrote: > Control: tags -1 - patch + upstream > Control: forwarded -1 https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7361 > > Unfortunately, this patch breaks compatibility with OpenSSL < 1.1.0, as > the CRYPTO_zalloc function does not exist there.

Bug#828552: spamassassin: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-10-29 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Control: tags -1 - patch + upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7361 On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:25:11PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > control: tags -1 patch > > On 2016-06-26 12:24:10 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > There is a libssl-dev pa

Bug#828552: spamassassin: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-09-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
control: tags -1 patch On 2016-06-26 12:24:10 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. builds. > If you have problems making things work, feel free

Bug#828552: spamassassin: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: spamassassin Version: 3.4.1-4 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Atte