On 11/24/2016 05:58 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> According to what I've read in yesterday's RT's irc meeting switching to
> libssl1.0-dev is the way to go.
Good to know. Is there some official transcript which one could reference
when proposing an NMU? There is, for example, f
On martes, 22 de noviembre de 2016 11:43:23 ART Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + pending
>
> ¡Hola Scott!
>
> El 2016-11-18 a las 20:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman escribió:
> > On November 18, 2016 7:37:31 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Would it be possible
Control: tag -1 + pending
¡Hola Scott!
El 2016-11-18 a las 20:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman escribió:
On November 18, 2016 7:37:31 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
Hi!
Would it be possible to change the build dependency from libssl-dev to
libssl1.0-dev for the time being to temporaril
On November 18, 2016 7:37:31 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Would it be possible to change the build dependency from libssl-dev to
>libssl1.0-dev for the time being to temporarily resolve this issue?
>
>It's rather ugly to have a library as central as kde4libs FTBFS because
>i
Hi!
Would it be possible to change the build dependency from libssl-dev to
libssl1.0-dev for the time being to temporarily resolve this issue?
It's rather ugly to have a library as central as kde4libs FTBFS because
it blocks archive rebuilds or the bootstrapping of new architectures.
Thanks,
Adr
Source: kde4libs
Version: 4.14.20-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attemp
6 matches
Mail list logo
