> No: maintaining such a patch kit would take a huge amount of our time
> for a very small benefit.
Okay, I can understand that, but if the patch kit is pushed upstream
then it won't be a problem? If it can't, maybe you can please document
the reasons you just stated why it can't be fixed in the D
On Jun 20, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> Please improve the portability of udev and reduce or eliminate the above
> list of required non-essential features.
No: maintaining such a patch kit would take a huge amount of our time
for a very small benefit.
> As a last resort, please make this apparent lack
Package: udev
Version: 230-2
Severity: wishlist
When trying to upgrade udev from version 175-7.2 to 230-2, I get greeted
by the:
> Since release 198, udev requires support for the following features in
> the running kernel:
>
> - inotify(2)(CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER)
> - signalfd(2)
3 matches
Mail list logo
