> > > 2. Is there some reason you packaged version 0.6.4? 0.6.6 is
> > > available.
> >=20
> > $ git tag | grep 0.6.6
> > [empty]
> Hmm, nevermind, not sure where I thought I'd found 0.6.8.
There is Version: 0.6.6 header in elisp file in upstream master.
But there is no corresponding tag. I pack
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:06:29PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > 1. The /source/ package name should actually be undo-tree not
> >elpa-undo-tree (team convention to use upstream's name). Probably
> >not worth changing now, but you should be aware of this for packaging
> >
> 1. The /source/ package name should actually be undo-tree not
>elpa-undo-tree (team convention to use upstream's name). Probably
>not worth changing now, but you should be aware of this for packaging
>other addons (you mentioned you wanted to package evil).
Ok. In self-protection c
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 07:55:34AM +0900, Sean Whitton wrote:
> As a member of the Emacs packaging team, I've had a look at this, and it
> seems fine. Thanks Dmitry.
In an attempt to improve the output of dh-make-elpa I'm looking at
Dmitry's package again, and I came up with the following
control: tag -1 +confirmed
As a member of the Emacs packaging team, I've had a look at this, and it
seems fine. Thanks Dmitry.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpa-undo-tree"
* Package name: elpa-undo-tree
Version : 0.6.4-1
Upstream Author : Toby Cubitt
* Url : http://www.dr-qubit.org/git/undo-tree.git
* Licenses
6 matches
Mail list logo
