On 17.06.2016, at 10:25, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> Am 14.06.2016 um 12:46 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
>> On 2016-06-14 12:25, Nikolas Grottendieck wrote:
>>> It appears you are correct and I just didn’t understand/read the package
>>> descriptions correctly … my bad.
>>> To prevent further misund
Am 14.06.2016 um 12:46 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: retitle -1 geoip-database-contrib: clarify description
>
> On 2016-06-14 12:25, Nikolas Grottendieck wrote:
>> It appears you are correct and I just didn’t understand/read the p
On 13.06.2016, at 19:03, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:07:04 +0200 Nikolas Grottendieck
> wrote:
>> according to bug report 767559 the conflict arising when trying to install
>> geoip-database-contrib should be fixed with version 1.17+nmu1 of
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 geoip-database-contrib: clarify description
On 2016-06-14 12:25, Nikolas Grottendieck wrote:
> It appears you are correct and I just didn’t understand/read the package
> descriptions correctly … my bad.
> To prevent fur
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:07:04 +0200 Nikolas Grottendieck
wrote:
> according to bug report 767559 the conflict arising when trying to install
> geoip-database-contrib should be fixed with version 1.17+nmu1 of
> geoip-database-contrib.
>
> However, I am currently still ge
Package: geoip-database-contrib
Version: 1.17+nmu1
Justification: Policy 7.6.1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
according to bug report 767559 the conflict arising when trying to install
geoip-database-contrib should be fixed with version 1.17+nmu1 of
geoip-database-contrib.
However, I am cu
6 matches
Mail list logo
