Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency -- NMUed

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, Martin Pitt [2016-06-04 0:35 +0200]: > Note that I'd like to NMU this together with bug #826205. While this > is just cleanup, #826205 is to avoid breakage once procps gets > uploaded and initscripts' priority gets dropped so that it drops from > the default install. I pushed this to

Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-06-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 patch Martin Pitt [2016-06-03 12:09 +0200]: > > Could you please drop the dependency which AFAICS was only necessary for > > smooth upgrades from Wheezy to Jessie? It seems sufficient that sysv-rc > > depends on startpar. > So IMHO we should move the dependendy to either sysvinit

Bug#825937: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-06-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Steve Langasek [2016-06-03 10:41 -0700]: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:12:43PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > In Ubuntu we never supported startpar (it's incompatible with upstart) > > It's not incompatible with upstart; this was implemented years ago. startpar doesn't work with upstart "task" jobs

Bug#825937: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:12:43PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > In Ubuntu we never supported startpar (it's incompatible with upstart) It's not incompatible with upstart; this was implemented years ago.

Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-06-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Andreas, Sven, Andreas Henriksson [2016-05-31 22:30 +0200]: > ... and sysvinit-utils is (still) Essential. > > This is in my opinion where the focus for changing things should be. > (Making sysvinit-utils non-essential, which means noone cares if > it depends on startpar. You might even disco

Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-06-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello, Sven Joachim [2016-05-31 17:16 +0200]: > With the "init" package no longer Essential, it is possible to remove > init, sysvinit-core, sysv-rc, initscripts and insserv from minimal > chroots. However, startpar remains because sysvinit-utils depends on > it. Note that this is/would be a cri

Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-05-31 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Sven Joachim. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > Package: sysvinit-utils > Version: 2.88dsf-59.4 > Severity: wishlist > > With the "init" package no longer Essential, it is possible to remove > init, sysvinit-core, sysv-rc, initscripts and insserv from minimal >

Bug#825937: sysvinit-utils: Please drop startpar dependency

2016-05-31 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: sysvinit-utils Version: 2.88dsf-59.4 Severity: wishlist With the "init" package no longer Essential, it is possible to remove init, sysvinit-core, sysv-rc, initscripts and insserv from minimal chroots. However, startpar remains because sysvinit-utils depends on it. Could you please drop