Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-29 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 28 May 2016 22:45:36 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-05-28 13:25:37 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Except that stable and oldstable systems do have RC bugs, regardless of > > what they are supposed to have. > > I think that ignoring them would be plain arbitrary... > > This

Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-28 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-05-28 13:25:37 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 27 May 2016 00:36:01 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2016-05-26 23:57:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 20:44:09 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > Even though the "affects" field does not carry any versi

Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-28 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 27 May 2016 00:36:01 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-05-26 23:57:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 20:44:09 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Even though the "affects" field does not carry any version tracking > > > information, it probably affects the current

Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-26 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-05-26 23:57:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2016 20:44:09 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Even though the "affects" field does not carry any version tracking > > information, it probably affects the current version or later. If the > > current version is no longer affected

Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 25 May 2016 20:44:09 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi Francesco, > > On 2016-05-25 19:35:48 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Please read section 'Why does apt-listbugs ignore the "affects" field?' > > in /usr/share/doc/apt-listbugs/README.Debian.gz : you'll find a detailed > > and (hopef

Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi Francesco, On 2016-05-25 19:35:48 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Please read section 'Why does apt-listbugs ignore the "affects" field?' > in /usr/share/doc/apt-listbugs/README.Debian.gz : you'll find a detailed > and (hopefully) clear explanation of the rationale behind the > deliberate choice

Bug#825283: apt-listbugs: misses bug with affects

2016-05-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.17 Severity: normal I get the following: # apt install qtchooser [...] The following packages will be upgraded: qtchooser 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/23.2 kB of archives. After this operation, 7168 B of additi