Bug#824827: mixmaster: hold on..

2017-11-30 Thread Anonymous
Package: mixmaster Version: 3.0.0-8.1 Followup-For: Bug #824827 > I know that. What you fail to realise is that the mixmaster > *specification* makes no mention of 4k keys! Then why would you claim it's not a bug for mixmaster to write packets for out-of-spec hosts? If a host doesn't conform to

Bug#824827: mixmaster: hold on..

2017-11-18 Thread Colin Tuckley
On 18/11/17 14:04, Nomen Nescio wrote: > You continue to misunderstand the bug report. This is not a feature > request for 4k key support. I know that. What you fail to realise is that the mixmaster *specification* makes no mention of 4k keys!

Bug#824827: mixmaster: hold on..

2017-11-18 Thread Nomen Nescio
Package: mixmaster Version: 3.0.0-8.1 Followup-For: Bug #824827 Dear Maintainer, > The bug reporter is incorrect about the status of mixmaster, it's > not designed to use 4k keys so it is hardly surprising that it fails > when you try to use them. You continue to misunderstand the bug report. T

Bug#824827: mixmaster: hold on..

2017-11-03 Thread Anonymous
Package: mixmaster Version: 3.0.0-8.1 Followup-For: Bug #824827 Dear Maintainer, > Mixmaster does not support 4k keys. > > It is not designed to support 4k keys. > > Closing the bug. Hold on.. even if the project has decided that 1k keys is the way forward, 2 bugs still remain: bug 1: mixmast