Bug#860013: Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2025-02-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2025-02-22 21:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:28:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > Control: severity 824442 important > > > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:20 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben

Bug#860013: Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2025-02-22 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:28:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: severity 824442 important > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:20 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On Mon, 1

Bug#860013: Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2022-12-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:28:41 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: severity 824442 important > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:20 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017

Bug#860013: Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-04-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: severity -1 important Control: severity 824442 important On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:20 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0200 Aurelien Jarno > > wrote: > > [...]  > > > Unfortunately

Bug#860013: Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-04-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0200 Aurelien Jarno > wrote: > [...]  > > Unfortunately I have been pointed on the libc-alpha mailing list that > > it doesn't work if another file which includes > > (e.g. ) is included befor

Bug#860013: Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-04-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote: [...]  > Unfortunately I have been pointed on the libc-alpha mailing list that > it doesn't work if another file which includes > (e.g. ) is included before . The problem is > that the __UAPI_DEF_IF_* constants are

Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-04-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
tag 824442 - pending clone 824442 -1 reassign -1 linux retitle -1 linux: libc-compat.h sets __UAPI_DEF_IF_* to 1 even when if.h hasn't been included thanks > On 2017-03-04 17:23, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:36:43 +0100 Aurelien Jarno > > wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > Now th

Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-04-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21367 On 2017-03-04 17:23, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:36:43 +0100 Aurelien Jarno > wrote: > > [...] > > > > Now that the change have been done on the kernel side, the bug is not > > really visible anymore, s

Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-03-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:36:43 +0100 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > [...] > > Now that the change have been done on the kernel side, the bug is not > really visible anymore, so nobody really cared about this bug. > > I'll see if I can come with a patch in the next days. > > Aurelien > > -- > Aurelien

Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-02-14 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2017-02-11 05:44, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2016 03:12:51 +0100 Ben Hutchings > wrote: > > Source: glibc > > Version: 2.22-7 > > Severity: serious > > > > (Continued from bug #822393.) > > > > glibc's should check whether has already been > > included and, if so, avoid making co

Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2017-02-10 Thread Niels Thykier
On Mon, 16 May 2016 03:12:51 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Source: glibc > Version: 2.22-7 > Severity: serious > > (Continued from bug #822393.) > > glibc's should check whether has already been > included and, if so, avoid making conflicting definitions. > > Including the headers in the oppos

Bug#824442: and conflict needs to be resolved

2016-05-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
Source: glibc Version: 2.22-7 Severity: serious (Continued from bug #822393.) glibc's should check whether has already been included and, if so, avoid making conflicting definitions. Including the headers in the opposite order works since this change in Linux 4.6: https://git.kernel.org/linus/