Bug#823624: devscripts: [uscan] please include tgz in @ARCHIVE_EXT@

2016-08-14 Thread Paul Wise
Control: retitle -1 devscripts: [uscan] please include short extensions (tgz/tbz/txz) in @ARCHIVE_EXT@ On Thu, 12 May 2016 01:08:12 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote: > At this moment, I chose not to complicate the code further unless such > case exists. There are 100 packages in Debian that use the short

Bug#823624: devscripts: [uscan] please include tgz in @ARCHIVE_EXT@

2016-05-11 Thread Osamu Aoki
control: severity 823624 wishlist On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 08:46:08PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sun 2016-05-08 02:45:40 -0400, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > I think it does but I think I had reason why I did not do this. > > It may have been something to do with signiture verification. > > I

Bug#823624: devscripts: [uscan] please include tgz in @ARCHIVE_EXT@

2016-05-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2016-05-08 02:45:40 -0400, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:15:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Package: devscripts >> Version: 2.16.4 >> Severity: normal >> Tags: patch >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> some upstreams (like sks) ship their tarballs as foo-1.1.5.

Bug#823624: devscripts: [uscan] please include tgz in @ARCHIVE_EXT@

2016-05-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:15:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.16.4 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > some upstreams (like sks) ship their tarballs as foo-1.1.5.tgz True and I was aware of it. > @ARCHIVE_EXT@ fails to locate

Bug#823624: devscripts: [uscan] please include tgz in @ARCHIVE_EXT@

2016-05-06 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: devscripts Version: 2.16.4 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, some upstreams (like sks) ship their tarballs as foo-1.1.5.tgz @ARCHIVE_EXT@ fails to locate this tarball. The attached patch should address this concern. --dkg -- Package-specific info: --- /etc/devscripts