Much simpler patch.
On 3 May 2016 at 09:02, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> On 3 May 2016 at 05:21, Tianon Gravi wrote:
>> On 1 May 2016 at 03:41, Michael Hudson-Doyle
>> wrote:
>>> dh_golang can fail when compiling with gccgo because in this case it's
>>> possible
>>> for go list to report no
Grr, this patch!
On 3 May 2016 at 10:05, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Much simpler patch.
>
> On 3 May 2016 at 09:02, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> On 3 May 2016 at 05:21, Tianon Gravi wrote:
>>> On 1 May 2016 at 03:41, Michael Hudson-Doyle
>>> wrote:
dh_golang can fail when compilin
On 3 May 2016 at 05:21, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 1 May 2016 at 03:41, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> dh_golang can fail when compiling with gccgo because in this case it's
>> possible
>> for go list to report no dependencies at all. Patch coming as soon as I get a
>> bug number :-)
>
> Couldn
On 1 May 2016 at 03:41, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> dh_golang can fail when compiling with gccgo because in this case it's
> possible
> for go list to report no dependencies at all. Patch coming as soon as I get a
> bug number :-)
Couldn't this also be fixed by just adding "-r" to the "xargs"
On 1 May 2016 at 22:41, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Package: dh-golang
> Version: 1.12ubuntu1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> dh_golang can fail when compiling with gccgo because in this case it's
> possible
> for go list to report no dependencies at all. Patch coming as soon as
Package: dh-golang
Version: 1.12ubuntu1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
dh_golang can fail when compiling with gccgo because in this case it's possible
for go list to report no dependencies at all. Patch coming as soon as I get a
bug number :-)
Cheers,
mwh
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
6 matches
Mail list logo