Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-06-05 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Many thanks for the detailed explanation. It's very helpful and informative, but I'll just reply to a couple points here. على الجمعـة 3 حزيران 2016 ‫04:12، كتب John Marshall: > On 1 Jun 2016, at 05:25, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > Thank you; I am glad to see the specific contexts leading to your c

Bug#822701: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-06-03 Thread John Marshall
On 1 Jun 2016, at 05:25, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > I sincerely apologize that this comes across as offensive-- it truly > wasn't intended that way. I was (and still am) somewhat confused about > this subject, thoug. My confusion is mostly about the tightness of the > htslib/samtools/bcftools interde

Bug#822701: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-06-02 Thread Afif Elghraoui
I was hoping someone would be able to explain these to me. Should I have been reporting bugs upstream when these happened? I did not press my questions before because I hadn't before got around to digging up the logs. على الثلاثاء 31 أيار 2016 ‫21:25، كتب Afif Elghraoui: > The first version of > b

Bug#822701: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-05-31 Thread John Marshall
On Mon, 2 May 2016 21:54:49 -0700 Afif Elghraoui wrote: > This seems to happen with every htslib upgrade in the past few releases. > bcftools builds have also been breaking as a result and I was a little > confused. Aren't backwards-compatibility breaks supposed to be indicated > by soname bumps?

Bug#822701: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-05-02 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Charles, I'm sorry for my late reply على الثلاثاء 26 نيسـان 2016 ‫21:38، كتب Charles Plessy: > Le Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:12:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : >> >> Perhaps we also need htslib 1.3.1 to "Break" samtools < 1.3.1... I cloned >> this bug to address that issue. > > Hi all, >

Bug#822701: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-04-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Control: tag -1 +pending Le Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:12:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > Perhaps we also need htslib 1.3.1 to "Break" samtools < 1.3.1... I cloned > this bug to address that issue. Hi all, I added: "Breaks: samtools (<< 1.3.1)". I think that it would be better to update

Bug#822701: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-04-26 Thread Charles Plessy
clone 822701 -2 reassign -2 htslib retitle -2 htslib 1.3.1 breaks samtools 1.3, at least at build time. retitle 822701 samtools 1.3 fails to build against htslib 1.3.1. tag 822701 +pending Le Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:02:28PM +0100, Chris Lamb a écrit : > Source: samtools > Version: 1.3-1 > Severity

Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

2016-04-26 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: samtools Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, samtools fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]