On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Jorge wrote:
> I wouldn't add Trisquel, because it's based on Ubuntu. Yes, ultimately, an
> Ubuntu derivative is a Debian derivative, but do we really want to add
> those? PureOS is a FSF-supported Debian derivative, so I plan to add that
> one to fill that free software purist
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:49:48 +0200 Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Roland Mas wrote:
> > I agree. I probably wouldn't have added it if the question arose
> > today (I still don't particularly like the concept, and I'm even more
> > unimpressed by the lack of release). But since the
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Roland Mas wrote:
> I agree. I probably wouldn't have added it if the question arose
> today (I still don't particularly like the concept, and I'm even more
> unimpressed by the lack of release). But since the text is already
> written and the project is alive, I see no rea
Raphael Hertzog, 2016-04-10 21:13:13 +0200 :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> While browsing the "Contents" section, I wonder why "Devuan" is listed
>> at 9th even before other significant derivative such as "Raspbian" at
>> 12th position.
> [...]
>> "devuan" is not even listed
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> While browsing the "Contents" section, I wonder why "Devuan" is listed
> at 9th even before other significant derivative such as "Raspbian" at
> 12th position.
[...]
> "devuan" is not even listed on distrowatch and it is only a bogus web
> site. I thin
Package: debian-handbook
Version: 8.20151209
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
While browsing the "Contents" section, I wonder why "Devuan" is listed
at 9th even before other significant derivative such as "Raspbian" at
12th position. Also "trisquel" which FSF endorsed is missing. (Not that
I liked some po
6 matches
Mail list logo
