Control: tags 819758 + pending
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 00:56 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:31:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags 819758 -moreinfo +confirmed
> >
> > [CC += the p-u bug]
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:35 +0200, gregor herrmann wrot
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:31:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags 819758 -moreinfo +confirmed
>
> [CC += the p-u bug]
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:35 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2016 09:27:44 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 0
Control: tags 819758 -moreinfo +confirmed
[CC += the p-u bug]
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:35 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2016 09:27:44 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:33:41AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > On Sun, 22 May 2016 21:40:43 +0100,
On Mon, 23 May 2016 09:27:44 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:33:41AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 May 2016 21:40:43 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > Not to my knowledge. I can publish the built packages for amd64
> > > somewhere temporarily and s
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:33:41AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2016 21:40:43 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > > Has anyone else tested the
> > > package?
> > Not to my knowledge. I can publish the built packages for amd64
> > somewhere temporarily and see if anyone can tes
On Sun, 22 May 2016 21:40:43 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > Has anyone else tested the
> > package?
> Not to my knowledge. I can publish the built packages for amd64
> somewhere temporarily and see if anyone can test them before they get
> as far as stable-proposed-updates.
I can install th
[CCing debian-perl]
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:31:10PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 14:43 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > I wondered if you needed any more information in order to process this
> > request - since I am aware it's a large diff? Can we do anything
> > di
On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 14:43 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I wondered if you needed any more information in order to process this
> request - since I am aware it's a large diff? Can we do anything
> different in order to make life easier as far as reviewing goes, or
> by providing more backgro
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Release team: please consider #819758 as being a request for the attached
> patch (which includes the previously-submitted change); there is more
> rationale about the patches included in [1] - but the short version is
> that th
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:31:18PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
[test branch for perl 5.20.3 changes]
> Looks good. I like the separate merges.
>
> Grouping together
> fixes/5.20.3/preserve_record_separator.diff
> fixes/5.20.3/test_count_base_rs.diff
> more explicitly might be nice but that's just
10 matches
Mail list logo
