control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:37:02AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Mattia, do you still consider this bug RC? thanks!
>
> I don't think so, no. Though it's still a crash, it's important, but
> probably not RC ind
On 11/3/2016 11:37 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Phillip, did you have a chance to look at making parted not crashing
> if there is only one unallocated sector between partitions? Mattia, do
> you still consider this bug RC? thanks!
I have not had time to work on it yet.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:37:02AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Mattia, do you still consider this bug RC? thanks!
I don't think so, no. Though it's still a crash, it's important, but
probably not RC indeed.
Furthermore I'm not affected by this anymore, since I "fixed" my
partition table to have
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:00:41 -0400 Phillip Susi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 04/11/2016 02:13 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52:32AM -0600, Curtis Gedak wrote:
> >> If I recall correctly, libparted was not able to handle when
> >> ther
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:00:41PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> I have sen a few bug reports about this recently though,
good to know I'm not the only one! I was in fact quite uneasy seeing
there were no reports in the BTS. :)
> and the others have reported using something
> called Easeus disk p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/11/2016 02:13 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52:32AM -0600, Curtis Gedak wrote:
>> If I recall correctly, libparted was not able to handle when
>> there was only one unallocated sector between logical partitions
>> (it e
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52:32AM -0600, Curtis Gedak wrote:
> If I recall correctly, libparted was not able to handle when there was
> only one unallocated sector between logical partitions (it expects at
> least two).
well, that's really not a reason to crash like that! ;)
> To work around the
On 16-04-11 11:42 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> Device Boot StartEndSectors Size Id Type
> /dev/sda1 * 2046 1953523711 1953521666 931.5G 5 Extended
> /dev/sda5 2048 99487 97440 476.9G 83 Linux
> /dev/sda6 1873524736 1933524991 625
control: reassign -1 src:parted 3.2-15
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:06:14AM -0600, Curtis Gedak wrote:
> Would you be able to provide the output from the following two commands?
sure thing :)
> sudo fdisk -l -u
mattia@chase ~ % sudo fdisk -l -u
[sudo] password for mattia:
Disk /dev/sda: 931.
Would you be able to provide the output from the following two commands?
sudo fdisk -l -u
where one of the options is a lower case "L" and not the number one.
sudo parted /path-to-your-device unit s print
where /path-to-your-device is something like /dev/sda.
I expect that latter c
Package: gparted
Version: 0.25.0-1
Severity: grave
mattia@chase ~ % gksudo gparted
==
libparted : 3.2
==
Backtrace has 16 calls on stack:
16: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x44) [0x7fc5feb2eae4]
15: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(
11 matches
Mail list logo
