Hi Stéphane,
> Binary packages have a cost. They are useful when [...]
Ok, that's your domain, I don't know nothing about the policies here.
> My remark was not related to the python version. I was just wondering if
> unison-fsmonitor could be provided by existing packages instead.
Sure. My pr
Le 03/12/2019 à 10:11, Benjamin Riefenstahl a écrit :
>> Is there any practical benefit in adding a new binary package?
>
> What is the problem with binary packages?
Binary packages have a cost. They are useful when they have additional
dependencies (that are optional for the main package) or whe
Hi Stéphane,
> Is there any practical benefit in adding a new binary package?
What is the problem with binary packages?
If you are asking, why not the python version instead, I already said
> The Python version of fsmonitor does seem to be flaky, the OCaml
> version seems better. I prefer it t
Le 21/03/2019 à 13:49, Benjamin Riefenstahl a écrit :
> See attached a new patch, that adds only the native fsmonitor.
Is there any practical benefit in adding a new binary package?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
Hi Stephane,
See attached a new patch, that adds only the native fsmonitor.
Thanks, benny
>From edac8a2918aed0eba453a2580d5f2e7f7c0f3ced Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Riefenstahl
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:10:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add package unison-fsmonitor. (Closes: #819341)
T
5 matches
Mail list logo
