Hello Sylvestre.
Packages llvm-toolchain-6.0 and llvm-toolchain-7 in buster show the
same behaviour in my building environment than llvm-toolchain-3.8, but
before reopening/cloning this bug it may be worth to comment here first.
Back in 2016, you said:
> I am building the LLVM toolchain twice a
tags 819278 help
thanks
I would welcome any help to reproduce this.
Some theories about why this might fail:
* Lack of memory. Thanks to a cron job looking at /proc/meminfo, I know
that llvm-toolchain-3.8 needs at least 4600 M of memory to build. Last
two times I tried I had only 3500 M and 800
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Hmm. Why not? The building of a package should not be a black box.
> because the current test execution is working fine (except for your issue of
> course).
> When a test is failing, I only get what I need and I don't have to dig for the
> actual err
Le 19/07/2016 à 14:09, Santiago Vila a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le 19/07/2016 à 10:32, Santiago Vila a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
The four are caused by the same issue: a test freezes.
Having the name of the test would be super helpful so t
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 19/07/2016 à 10:32, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
> > > The four are caused by the same issue: a test freezes.
> > > Having the name of the test would be super helpful so that we can report
> > > a bug
Le 19/07/2016 à 10:32, Santiago Vila a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
The four are caused by the same issue: a test freezes.
Having the name of the test would be super helpful so that we can report
a bug upstream to fix it.
I fully agree, and I'd love to provide the test
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> The four are caused by the same issue: a test freezes.
> Having the name of the test would be super helpful so that we can report
> a bug upstream to fix it.
I fully agree, and I'd love to provide the test which fails, but the
build process is complet
severity 819278 normal
thanks
Hello,
Le 19/07/2016 à 00:02, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> severity 819278 serious
> thanks
>
> Well, I tried to build this package four times already, and it always
> failed, so it's not that it "does not build reliably", but instead
> it "realiably does not build", or
retitle 819278 llvm-toolchain-3.8: Build not reliable
severity 819278 normal
user sanv...@debian.org
usertags 819278 - binary-indep
thanks
This bug needs to be investigated, but it does not seem to be the
typical binary-indep bug so I'm removing it from my list of
binary-indep bugs for now.
Thank
9 matches
Mail list logo
