On 07/07/16 at 16:10 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks Lucas!
>
> [Lucas Nussbaum, 2016-07-07]
> > Please find below a list of packages whose build log contains "no
> > package to act on". No packages contain the same string prepended by
> > "E: " as pointed in the message above.
> >
On Thursday, July 07, 2016 03:36:27 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 10/06/16 at 15:31 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > [Raphael Hertzog, 2016-06-10]
> >
> > > We just need to rebuild the package build-depending on dh-python,
> > > and then grep buildlogs on "E: no package to act on" to find out ho
Hi,
thanks Lucas!
[Lucas Nussbaum, 2016-07-07]
> Please find below a list of packages whose build log contains "no
> package to act on". No packages contain the same string prepended by
> "E: " as pointed in the message above.
>
> I can provide the build logs if useful.
are all of them availabl
On 10/06/16 at 15:31 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Raphael Hertzog, 2016-06-10]
> > We just need to rebuild the package build-depending on dh-python,
> > and then grep buildlogs on "E: no package to act on" to find out how many
> > are affected. Is that correct?
>
> correct
Hi,
Please find be
On 10/06/16 at 15:31 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Raphael Hertzog, 2016-06-10]
> > We just need to rebuild the package build-depending on dh-python,
> > and then grep buildlogs on "E: no package to act on" to find out how many
> > are affected. Is that correct?
>
> correct
I just started an a
[Raphael Hertzog, 2016-06-10]
> We just need to rebuild the package build-depending on dh-python,
> and then grep buildlogs on "E: no package to act on" to find out how many
> are affected. Is that correct?
correct
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> I added some errors and warnings in dh-python 2.20160609:
Thanks!
> If you think that's enough, please close this bug. If not, I will leave
> it open until somebody checks the impact on the archive (line with
> exit(7) is commented out, if someone wan
7 matches
Mail list logo
