Hi Helmut,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:09:03PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I'm still kinda split about this. I discussed this with Guillem Jover
> and Ian Jackson at length to avoid that step and still don't like it.
Same for me.
> > Do you have any use cases where the documentat
Hi Dmitry,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:17:07PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> So are you also interested in me making Sphinx architecture:any?
I'm still kinda split about this. I discussed this with Guillem Jover
and Ian Jackson at length to avoid that step and still don't like it.
> Do you have
Hi Johannes,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:26:36AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> I just built src:sphinx on all porter boxes of release architectures.
Thanks for this effort, I appreciate it regardless of status of this bug.
> The only FTBFS I observed was on mips and the problem on mips went aw
Hi Dmitry,
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 22:21:58 +0100 Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> (Also, if I just apply the change you suggested, sphinx will FTBFS on some
> archs, because the tests use webkit which segfaults there — so it's a bit
> more tricky).
I just built src:sphinx on all porter boxes of release arc
Hi Helmut,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:40:00PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> 161 is many packages, though in my opinion splitting the documentation into
>> arch:all packages is something that should be done independently of this bug.
>> Maybe we can have some kind of DD list whose packages are aff
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:34:04PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> As you can see, I don't always reply quickly. Sorry for the delay this time.
Things go slowly in cross-land anyway. Thanks for your continued
interest. :)
> > Cross building only applied to arch-dep packages. So in jan
Hi Helmut,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:05:11AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thank you for your quick and insightful reply.
As you can see, I don't always reply quickly. Sorry for the delay this time.
> Cross building only applied to arch-dep packages. So in jansson's case,
> it is
Control: tags -1 - patch
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for your quick and insightful reply.
Please Cc debian-cr...@lists.debian.org.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:21:58PM +0100, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I wonder what's the point of cross-building the arch-indep packages at all?
> In jansson case, it looks
Hi Helmut,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 09:32:28PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> [skip]
>
> So here is a patch:
>
> sed -i -e '/Package: python3\?-sphinx/,+1s/\(Architecture: a\)ll/\1ny/'
> debian/control
>
> Please apply it, so we can start adding the :native annotation to
> reverse dependencies
Package: python-sphinx
Version: 1.3.6-2
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: block #807848 by -1
Hi,
I have a request that may sound strange: Please turn python-sphinx and
python3-sphinx from Architecture: all into Architecture: any. On first
hearing this, it may ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
