On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:59:26AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello Moritz,
>
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > (This is a first high level view, the exact requirements can be hashed
> > out later.)
>
> It would be good to go a bit into more details now.
>
> > It would be
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Are you only asking for two repositories that can be targetted with
> > dput? Or are you asking for more?
>
> No not really a second dput upload. We were thinking of: once a
> package is in the embargoed policy queue and the issues for the
> res
Hi Raphael,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:59:26AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello Moritz,
>
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > (This is a first high level view, the exact requirements can be hashed
> > out later.)
>
> It would be good to go a bit into more details now.
>
>
Hello Moritz,
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> (This is a first high level view, the exact requirements can be hashed
> out later.)
It would be good to go a bit into more details now.
> It would be great to have a simple (single command) method to simplify
> testing security upda
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:41:57PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This was discussed at one of the past security team meetings, but
> there was never a bug for that:
>
> (This is a first high level view, the exact requirements can be hashed
> o
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
This was discussed at one of the past security team meetings, but
there was never a bug for that:
(This is a first high level view, the exact requirements can be hashed
out later.)
It would be great to have a simple (single command) method to simplify
t
6 matches
Mail list logo
