Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 08/03/16 13:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Many architectures will be binNMUd against libc6 2.22, but please on
> > kfreebsd-* could you binNMU these packages against libc0.1 2.22 instead:
> >
> > * p11-kit (breaks sid at the moment)
> > * libnss-db
>
> I
On 08/03/16 13:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many architectures will be binNMUd against libc6 2.22, but please on
> kfreebsd-* could you binNMU these packages against libc0.1 2.22 instead:
>
> * p11-kit (breaks sid at the moment)
> * libnss-db
>
> hurd-i386 may also need rebuilds a
Hi,
Many architectures will be binNMUd against libc6 2.22, but please on
kfreebsd-* could you binNMU these packages against libc0.1 2.22 instead:
* p11-kit (breaks sid at the moment)
* libnss-db
hurd-i386 may also need rebuilds against libc0.3 2.22:
* (libp11 was binNMUd already)
* dant
On 2016-03-07 10:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.22.html
>
> On 07/03/16 01:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@pack
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.22.html
On 07/03/16 01:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
We would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.22. It is currently
available in experimental and has been built successfully on all
official architectures except h
6 matches
Mail list logo
