Hi!
Norbert Preining writes:
> I sent already a minimal example derived from the sbcl code to the ti
> list, you should have gotten it cc
just seen it minutes after sending the email. Thanks for the fast
reaction!
Christoph
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Upstream has decided this is a problem in texinfo .. can I have your
> input on this issue?
Please for now I suggest to drop the attached patch into
debian/patches
and adjust debian/patches/series.
With this change sbcl does build on my syste
sorry, scrap that ...
> Attached is a second version which is a bit simpler, following
> the advice of Gavin to use \gdef here.
But needs gdef *everywhere*
> \long\def\dashphelper#1\dashphelper{
>\ifx\dashphelper\next\dashfalse\else\dashtrue\fi
> }
> -\def\lw#1{\leavevmode\dashp{#1}\ifdash
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Please for now I suggest to drop the attached patch into
> debian/patches
> and adjust debian/patches/series.
Attached is a second version which is a bit simpler, following
the advice of Gavin to use \gdef here.
Norbert
--
I sent already a minimal example derived from the sbcl code to the ti list, you
should have gotten it cc
On March 16, 2016 7:43:00 PM GMT+09:00, Christoph Egger
wrote:
>Norbert Preining writes:
>> apt-get source sbcl and build is enough to reproduce?
>
>That's what I did in a clean sid chroot
Norbert Preining writes:
> apt-get source sbcl and build is enough to reproduce?
That's what I did in a clean sid chroot yesterday. You need to actually
run the build as some input files to the manual get generated during
build though.
Christoph
On 16.03.2016 10:17, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi,
> apt-get source sbcl and build is enough to reproduce?
>
Eventually run "apt-get build-dep" before build.
Hilmar
--
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ #206401 http://counter.li.org
Hi Hilmar,
apt-get source sbcl and build is enough to reproduce?
Norbert
On March 16, 2016 6:02:37 PM GMT+09:00, "Preuße, Hilmar" wrote:
>On 16.03.2016 09:19, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
>Hi Norbert,
>
>I can reproduce it w/ -3 and -5.
>
>> Which version of texinfo? I have uploaded several fixes
On 16.03.2016 09:19, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Norbert,
I can reproduce it w/ -3 and -5.
> Which version of texinfo? I have uploaded several fixes already,
> the latest is 6.1.0.dfsg.1-5
>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1549892
>
> The bug was reported on 02-26, the last fixed upload
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > | .texinfo:3: TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [text input levels=15].
>
> Upstream has decided this is a problem in texinfo .. can I have your
> input on this issue?
Which version of texinfo? I have uploaded several fixes already,
the latest is 6.1.0.d
Hi texinfo folks!
Christoph Egger writes:
> Logan Rosen writes:
>> I just merged sbcl 2:1.3.1-1 into Ubuntu (we have a simple chmod change in
>> debian/rules), and it failed to build on all architectures [1]. I verified
>> that this issue affects Debian unstable as well by building it in a chroo
Hi!
Logan Rosen writes:
> I just merged sbcl 2:1.3.1-1 into Ubuntu (we have a simple chmod change in
> debian/rules), and it failed to build on all architectures [1]. I verified
> that this issue affects Debian unstable as well by building it in a chroot.
>
> It appears to be due to a TeX issue d
Source: sbcl
Version: 2:1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
I just merged sbcl 2:1.3.1-1 into Ubuntu (we have a simple chmod change in
debian/rules), and it failed to build on all architectures [1]. I verified
that this issu
13 matches
Mail list logo
