Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 07/03/16 06:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > What to do about the entanglement with the libvigraimpex transition > (#815153) through saga? > > Should we get saga removed from testing to allow the rest of the > affected packages in the gdal transition to migrate? I'm not sure that'll be neces

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
What to do about the entanglement with the libvigraimpex transition (#815153) through saga? Should we get saga removed from testing to allow the rest of the affected packages in the gdal transition to migrate? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 05/03/16 00:26, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Can you also binNMU opencv (3.0.0+dfsg-1~exp2) in experimental with > libgdal20? Sure. Scheduled. Emilio

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 04-03-16 00:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 04/03/16 00:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> All rdeps on mips64el are affected by this bug and will need to be >>> rebuilt with gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2), sorry about that. > > No problem. Sched

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/03/16 00:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> All rdeps on mips64el are affected by this bug and will need to be >> rebuilt with gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2), sorry about that. No problem. Scheduled. >> I think this requires both new NMUs combined wit

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 03-03-16 20:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenb

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 03-03-16 20:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Mon

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwen

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Mon

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Thanks. I'll upload gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) to unstable shortly. binNMUs scheduled. Emilio

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better >> than https://release.debian.org/tra

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-01 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wr

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-03-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-21 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 19-02-16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > For the De

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: Package: release.debian.org For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently re

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released >>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ sym

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-12 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released >> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt. >> >> GDAL 2.0.2 was released

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-06 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt. GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, bu