control: tag -1 -patch +pending
Hello Paul, Ian,
It looks like we have a clear consensus that my patch is fine, but while
it might be that there is further loosening of the restriction on
network access that should be done in addition to my patch, we do not
know exactly what yet.
So I'm applying
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Bug#813471: Seeking seconds for patch to permit some
network access to localhost"):
> Sean and I discussed this at DebCamp and he mentioned that udeb
> building packages have an exception from (most?) of policy, so we
> probably do not need this particul
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 20:16 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> LGTM. It might be worth saying "the apt repository (both source and
> binaries)". There are both packages which fetch .debs explicitly, and
> packages which fetch sources explicitly (yes, this is not very good,
> but consensus in a discussi
Paul Wise writes ("Bug#813471: Seeking seconds for patch to permit some network
access to localhost"):
> For clarity, how about we separate the two types of network access?
>
> In addition, d-i relies on access to the apt repo for the system.
> I can imagine other uses
Sean Whitton:
> Here is a revised patch; David, hopefully you will renew your second.
>
>> diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst
>> index 9e7d79c..890c479 100644
>> --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
>> +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst
>> @@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ non-interactive. It also follows t
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 05:19:14PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 +patch
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch, for which I am seeking seconds, that tries to capture
> the points raised by Osamu, Guillem and Paul without getting into
> legalese -- Bill has a point. In particular, I think
On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 10:41 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Basically I read "No required target may attempt network access via the
> loopback interface (except if/when ...).". To me that implies /only/
> the loopback interface is restricted by that sentence (i.e. any other
> network interface is n
Sean Whitton writes:
>
> Here is a revised patch; David, hopefully you will renew your second.
>
>> diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst
>> index 9e7d79c..890c479 100644
>> --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
>> +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst
>> @@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ non-interactive. It also
[dropping some CCs]
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 10:41AM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Basically I read "No required target may attempt network access via the
> loopback interface (except if/when ...).". To me that implies /only/
> the loopback interface is restricted by that sentence (i.e. any o
Sean Whitton:
> Hello Niels,
>
> On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 09:33AM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> The proposed text is awkward for me because I basically read it as:
>>
>> ""
>> For packages in the main archive, no required targets may attempt
>> network access, [... exception ...], via the loopback
Hello Niels,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 09:33AM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The proposed text is awkward for me because I basically read it as:
>
> ""
> For packages in the main archive, no required targets may attempt
> network access, [... exception ...], via the loopback interface.
> """
>
> Which
Sean Whitton:
> control: tag -1 +patch
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch, for which I am seeking seconds, that tries to capture
> the points raised by Osamu, Guillem and Paul without getting into
> legalese -- Bill has a point. In particular, I think we can trust
> package maintainers to interpret
Sean Whitton writes:
> control: tag -1 +patch
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch, for which I am seeking seconds, that tries to capture
> the points raised by Osamu, Guillem and Paul without getting into
> legalese -- Bill has a point. In particular, I think we can trust
> package maintainers to int
control: tag -1 +patch
Hello,
Here is a patch, for which I am seeking seconds, that tries to capture
the points raised by Osamu, Guillem and Paul without getting into
legalese -- Bill has a point. In particular, I think we can trust
package maintainers to interpret "started by the build" sensibl
14 matches
Mail list logo
