Bug#812207: CVE-2016-0728

2016-01-25 Thread Akihiro Suda
> You would have got a faster response if you had reported the bug > against a real package name in the first place. I'm sorry for that. 2016-01-26 10:29 GMT+09:00 Ben Hutchings : > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:06 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote: >> On Jan 25, 2016 4:49 PM, "Ben Hutchings" wrote: >> >

Bug#812207: CVE-2016-0728

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:06 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote: > On Jan 25, 2016 4:49 PM, "Ben Hutchings" wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:23 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote: > > > Can this issue be treated with high importance? > > > > You would have got a faster response if you had reported the

Bug#812207: CVE-2016-0728

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:23 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote: > Can this issue be treated with high importance? You would have got a faster response if you had reported the bug against a real package name in the first place. > Right now, there is no > version of jessie-stable or wheezy-backports whic