Bug#811976: zimlib: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes

2016-04-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2016-04-16 16:38:05) > Matthias Klose writes: > > looking at the missing symbols, these are > > > > - destructor symbols > > - template instantiations > > > > I think you can mark all of these as optional, and the package should > > be buildable with GCC 5 and GCC 6 > >

Bug#811976: zimlib: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes

2016-04-16 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hello Doko, Matthias Klose writes: > looking at the missing symbols, these are > > - destructor symbols > - template instantiations > > I think you can mark all of these as optional, and the package should > be buildable with GCC 5 and GCC 6 Thanks for confirming. I just updated the symbols f

Bug#811976: zimlib: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes

2016-04-15 Thread Matthias Klose
looking at the missing symbols, these are - destructor symbols - template instantiations I think you can mark all of these as optional, and the package should be buildable with GCC 5 and GCC 6

Bug#811976: zimlib: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes

2016-01-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: zimlib Version: 1.2-8 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-symbols This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch. Note that only the first er