Bug#811207: transition: libcutl

2016-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-01-18 13:23, László Böszörményi wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On 2016-01-16 20:17, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: [...], but I plan to upload soname 1.10 version. May I upload it directly to Sid or should I target experimental first? The only affec

Bug#811207: transition: libcutl

2016-01-18 Thread GCS
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2016-01-16 20:17, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: >> [...], but I plan to upload soname 1.10 version. May I upload >> it directly to Sid or should I target experimental first? >> The only affected binary is odb which can be binNMUed.

Bug#811207: transition: libcutl

2016-01-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed On 2016-01-16 20:17, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: Mini-transition of libcutl. It has 1.8 soname in Sid and 1.9 in experimental, but I plan to upload soname 1.10 version. May I upload it directly to Sid or should I target experimental first? The only affected binary i

Bug#811207: transition: libcutl

2016-01-16 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Mini-transition of libcutl. It has 1.8 soname in Sid and 1.9 in experimental, but I plan to upload soname 1.10 version. May I upload it directly to Sid or should I target experimental fir