Control: tags -1 + pending
On 02/07/2016 11:56 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 11:39 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> That's not so great.
>>
>> I looked at the source code of logout-all.sh again found
>> the mistake: when reading in /run/o-i/s-k-s, it would just use
>> XXX=$
On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 11:39 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> That's not so great.
>
> I looked at the source code of logout-all.sh again found
> the mistake: when reading in /run/o-i/s-k-s, it would just use
> XXX=$(cat /run/o-i/s-k-s)
> But to then check whether a session was excluded, it would u
On 02/07/2016 11:38 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 15:11 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>>
>> root@debian-sanboot:~# systemctl stop open-iscsi
>>
>> root@debian-sanboot:~# cat /run/open-iscsi/shutdown-keep-sessions
>> /sys/devices/platform/host2/session1
>> /sys/devices/plat
Hi Ritesh,
On 02/07/2016 10:41 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Looks like this invocation is problematic
>
> root@debian-sanboot:~# /lib/open-iscsi/umountiscsi.sh
> ls: cannot access /dev/sda?*: No such file or directory
> ls: cannot access /dev/sdb?*: No such file or directory
> ls: cannot
On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 15:11 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> root@debian-sanboot:~# systemctl stop open-iscsi
>
> root@debian-sanboot:~# cat /run/open-iscsi/shutdown-keep-sessions
> /sys/devices/platform/host2/session1
> /sys/devices/platform/host3/session2
> /sys/devices/platform/host4/sessi
On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 13:34 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 12:35 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > But the change you've proposed has other repercussion. It breaks
> > shutdown, because now, iscsi service/sessions are terminated way
> > early.
> > This leaves, effectively, a hung san
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 19:16 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 12:13 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > Well, that would not be ideal, obviously. But if we propagate the
> > error and just ignore 15 (already logged in) then we'll have the
> > case that some portals will be in the logged-in
Hi Ritesh,
On 12/30/2015 12:13 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Well, that would not be ideal, obviously. But if we propagate the
> error and just ignore 15 (already logged in) then we'll have the
> case that some portals will be in the logged-in state and others
> might not; and if systemd thinks th
On 12/30/2015 12:35 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> But the change you've proposed has other repercussion. It breaks
> shutdown, because now, iscsi service/sessions are terminated way early.
> This leaves, effectively, a hung sanboot system.
>
> Please see attached images.
>
> I also didn't like t
But the change you've proposed has other repercussion. It breaks
shutdown, because now, iscsi service/sessions are terminated way early.
This leaves, effectively, a hung sanboot system.
Please see attached images.
I also didn't like that iscsi shutdown, even thought my rootfs was
running.
I'll k
Hi Ritesh,
On 12/30/2015 10:56 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> So one solution could be to use SuccessExitStatus=0 15 in the unit to
>> say that 'already logged in' is not an error condition (and possibly
>> others, I'd have to check the manpage) - but I think that is
>> short-sighted, as this wil
Hello Christian,
On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 18:43 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> I have been trying to play around with my VM setup, to build an
> > iSCSI
> > SAN Boot Setup. In doing that, I noticed something odd. Perhaps you
> > may
> > have some pointers.
> >
> > root@debian-sanboot:~# /etc/init.
Control: merge 809320 809334
Control: tags 809320 + confirmed
Hi Ritesh,
On 12/29/2015 11:47 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hope you are doing good. And wish you belated Christman and a coming
> Happy New Year. :-)
Thanks, you as well. :)
Unfortunately, I'm a bit busy right now until the 16th o
Package: open-iscsi
Severity: important
Hello Christian,
Hope you are doing good. And wish you belated Christman and a coming
Happy New Year. :-)
I have been trying to play around with my VM setup, to build an iSCSI
SAN Boot Setup. In doing that, I noticed something odd. Perhaps you may
have so
14 matches
Mail list logo
