Control: reassign -1 jemalloc
Control: tags -1 patch
On 12/10/2015 06:06 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 06:04 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
>>> jemalloc which currently FTBFS on this architecture [1].
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/10/2015 06:23 PM, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Do you still want me to remove jemalloc dependency from nghttp2,
> then?
I'll do a test-build of jemalloc first and verify that Andreas'
suggestion works with the current version in Debian which is
a b
On 10/12/15 18:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Andreas!
>
> On 12/10/2015 06:04 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
> >> jemalloc which currently FTBFS on this architecture [1].
> >
> > jemalloc builds fine and passes the t
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
> jemalloc which currently FTBFS on this architecture [1].
jemalloc builds fine and passes the testsuite if you pass
--with-lg-quantum=3 to configure.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@li
Hi Andreas!
On 12/10/2015 06:04 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
>> jemalloc which currently FTBFS on this architecture [1].
>
> jemalloc builds fine and passes the testsuite if you pass
> --with-lg-quantum=3 to configure.
Ah, good
Source: nghttp2
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hello!
nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
jemalloc which currently FTBFS on this architecture [1].
Thus, please add m68k to the list of architectures (which cur
6 matches
Mail list logo
