> "JAK" == Julian Andres Klode writes:
>>
JAK> There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org
>>
>> Any better place to reassign it?
>> Even if they are generated differently,
>> when they get to the user they look like they are coming from the same
>> software.
JAK> Sorry, no. You
[oops; adding CC to #806378]
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 18:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 01:32 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
> > thanks
>
> Why? None of the messages that you're discussing are produced by the
> BTS.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ada
On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 01:32 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
> thanks
Why? None of the messages that you're discussing are produced by the
BTS.
Regards,
Adam
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:01:50AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > "JAK" == Julian Andres Klode writes:
>
> JAK> There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org
>
> Any better place to reassign it?
> Even if they are generated differently,
> when they get to the user they look like
> "JAK" == Julian Andres Klode writes:
JAK> There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org
Any better place to reassign it?
Even if they are generated differently,
when they get to the user they look like they are coming from the same software.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:32:09AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
> thanks
>
> David, what kind of software are you using to make these reports?
> Please mention it on bug 806378 and Cc me. Thanks!
> I see the package name was listed, but the bug title is not.
Al
reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
thanks
David, what kind of software are you using to make these reports?
Please mention it on bug 806378 and Cc me. Thanks!
I see the package name was listed, but the bug title is not.
> "DK" == David Kalnischkies writes:
DK> Control: tag 805424 pending
DK> H
7 matches
Mail list logo
