Hi i don't see any problem here
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liblastfm&suite=unstable
But if you have a fixed package feel free to ping me and i'll have a look(I'm
not a symbols - savvy man)
Cheers,
G
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Wed, 9 Dec, 2015 at 21:09, Stefan Ahle
Hi,
Thanks for signing and uploading!
> Note: I removed the "debian/liblastfm*.new", because it was useless in
> the context.
>
> I also tried to mv the .new in the original and correct location, but
> the build failed with a gensybols error.
>
> so I just removed it and signed&uploaded.
This
Hi,
I've uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net
> sure, I built for the last missing archs:
> http://debomatic-powerpc.debian.net/distribution#unstable/liblastfm/1.0.9-1/buildlog
> http://debomatic-s390x.debian.net/distribution#unstable/liblastfm/1.0.9-1/buildlog
Thanks for building, but it
Hi Stefan,
>yes, the question actually is why one is liblastfm1 and the other
>liblastfm5-1(I mean the -1, but it isn't a real problem I guess)
>On Qt4 build the library so-name is liblastfm.so.1 and the package
> scheme is: → liblastfm1
>For the Qt5 build the name is liblastfm5.so.1 and the
Hi,
> yes, the question actually is why one is liblastfm1 and the other
> liblastfm5-1(I mean the -1, but it isn't a real problem I guess)
On Qt4 build the library so-name is liblastfm.so.1 and the package
scheme is: ** → liblastfm1
For the Qt5 build the name is liblastfm5.so.1 and the scheme i
Hi,
>Fixed! I've set up a new repository.
wonderful
>Oha, this is great. Now the symbols are human readable.
:)
>liblastfm1 is build against Qt4 and liblastfm5-1 is build against Qt5.
>I've adopt the names of lintian.
yes, the question actually is why one is liblastfm1 and the other
libl
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 12:05 +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> In which case I should add UpstreamMetadatas into the package?
Whenever there is an upstream where you can fill in any of the fields
listed on the UpstreamMetadata wiki page.
> Is it a "nice to have" feature or in some cases necessary?
I
Paul Wise wrotes:
> If the wiki page isn't clear enough, try the examples:
> https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata#Examples
Sorry my question was wrong. In which case I should add
UpstreamMetadatas into the package? Is it a "nice to have" feature or in
some cases necessary? For me it looks lik
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> I'm not sure what I have to add for upstream metadatas
If the wiki page isn't clear enough, try the examples:
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata#Examples
> I do not know what to do with the output of
>
> flawfinder -Q -c .
I would j
Hi,
> 1) VCS-* they should point to Debian packaging, not to upstream packaging
> (this is done in copyright)
Fixed! I've set up a new repository.
> 2) symbols:
> sed 's/ \(_.*\) \(.*\)/ (c++)"\1" \2/' package.symbols | c++filt >
> package.symbols.new
>
> and look to the "new" file :)
> (you might
Hi,
>I tried to fix most of the points. I replaced my patch with a applied
>upstream patch. One of the symbol files had a wrong file name. This
>should be fixed, too.
lets see :)
1) VCS-* they should point to Debian packaging, not to upstream packaging
(this is done in copyright)
2) symbols:
s
Hi,
I tried to fix most of the points. I replaced my patch with a applied
upstream patch. One of the symbol files had a wrong file name. This
should be fixed, too.
I'm not sure what I have to add for upstream metadatas and I do not know
what to do with the output of
flawfinder -Q -c .
Please l
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Stefan
(some issues of libjdns also apply here, and Pabs review is correct, so please
check them before)
in additions:
please consider moving priority to optional
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
the other
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblastfm"
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here is a review:
There don't appear to be any blockers.
These things would be nice to fix:
Please put DEP-3 a header on the patch.
http:/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblastfm"
* Package name: liblastfm
Version : 1.0.9-1
Upstream Author : Michael Coffey
* URL : https://github.com/lastfm/liblastfm
* License : GPL-3+
Se
15 matches
Mail list logo
