On 11/10/2015 05:42 AM, Bob Mottram wrote:
> It looks as if there has already been quite extensive discussion on the
> topic of default ssh server settings in debian.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774793
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774711
>
> So I don
It looks as if there has already been quite extensive discussion on the
topic of default ssh server settings in debian.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774793
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774711
So I don't think I have much more to add to that. Something els
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:14:01PM -0500, James Valleroy wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 04:58 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Bob Mottram]
> >> This patch adds some extra hardening to the ssh server settings, in
> >> accordance with the recommendations on bettercrypto.org.
> > This approach, editing th
On 11/09/2015 04:58 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Bob Mottram]
>> This patch adds some extra hardening to the ssh server settings, in
>> accordance with the recommendations on bettercrypto.org.
> This approach, editing the file /etc/ssh/sshd_config after installation,
> will very likely cause c
[Bob Mottram]
> This patch adds some extra hardening to the ssh server settings, in
> accordance with the recommendations on bettercrypto.org.
This approach, editing the file /etc/ssh/sshd_config after installation,
will very likely cause conffile question during upgrades when the
package maintain
Package: freedombox-setup
Severity: wishlist
It seems odd sending a patch as a bug report, but freedombox-discuss just
gives me "550 Administrative prohibition".
This patch adds some extra hardening to the ssh server settings, in
accordance with the recommendations on bettercrypto.org.
Possibly
6 matches
Mail list logo
