Bug#803833: libavg: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2016-01-08 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Dimitri, Thanks for your fast reply. On 08.01.2016 13:41, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > All my packages should be marked as LowNMU and I expect and hope for > everyone to fix and upload things =) > > So instead of filing a bug report and/or attaching a patch, you could > have simply uploaded t

Bug#803833: libavg: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2016-01-08 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hi, On 7 January 2016 at 23:07, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month > (and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9). > > Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month > I'm wondering what the status of this

Bug#803833: libavg: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2016-01-07 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Dear Maintainer, the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month (and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9). Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month I'm wondering what the status of this bug is: * Are you aware of the patch I provided? * Do you plan an upl

Bug#803833: libavg: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

2015-11-02 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Package: libavg Version: 1.8.1-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ffmpeg2.9 Dear Maintainer, your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9. This bug will become release-critical at some point when the ffmpeg2.9 transitio