On 13.01.2016 01:02, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:48:28PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>>> The patch to build against the new FFmpeg is waiting in my repository,
>>> when as the new packages are out I can upload fuse-utils immediately.
>>
>> Unless you think the new upst
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:48:28PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > The patch to build against the new FFmpeg is waiting in my repository,
> > when as the new packages are out I can upload fuse-utils immediately.
>
> Unless you think the new upstream version is going to be released
> this mont
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi Alberto,
On 12.01.2016 23:41, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>>> I'll talk to upstream and see what they think about this, but in
>>> principle I'd rather stick to the official release as much as
>>> possibl
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > I'll talk to upstream and see what they think about this, but in
> > principle I'd rather stick to the official release as much as
> > possible and rebuild it with FFmpeg 2.9/3.0 when it's out.
>
> I don't mind either way, as
Hi Alberto,
On 11.01.2016 17:28, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> I'll talk to upstream and see what they think about this, but in
> principle I'd rather stick to the official release as much as possible
> and rebuild it with FFmpeg 2.9/3.0 when it's out.
I don't mind either way, as long as this bug is fi
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:48:44PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > Upstream said that they're planning to remove the FFmpeg
> > dependency for the next release, so let's do it like this:
> >
> > - If there's a new upstream version I'll upload it and this patch will
> > not be needed.
> >
>
Hi Berto,
On 04.11.2015 08:59, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> Do you want me to upload the new fuse package now, or shall I
>>> better wait until the new FFMPEG reaches Debian?
>>
>> It would be good if most the packages were ready fo
Hi Alberto,
On 04.11.2015 08:59, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> Upstream said that they're planning to remove the FFmpeg dependency
> for the next release, so let's do it like this:
>
> - If there's a new upstream version I'll upload it and this patch will
> not be needed.
>
> - If FFmpeg 2.9 is read
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > Do you want me to upload the new fuse package now, or shall I
> > better wait until the new FFMPEG reaches Debian?
>
> It would be good if most the packages were ready for ffmpeg 2.9,
> when it get's released. Thus it would be
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/fuse-emulator/patches/341/
Hi Alberto,
On 03.11.2015 15:38, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> Thanks, I forwarded it upstream:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/fuse-emulator/patches/341/
Thanks, I'm marking the bug accordingly.
> Do you want me to upload the
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:06:14PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Package: fuse-emulator-utils
> Version: 1.1.1-4
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ffmpeg2.9
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> your package fails to build with the u
Package: fuse-emulator-utils
Version: 1.1.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ffmpeg2.9
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9.
This bug will become release-critical at some point when the
ffmpeg
12 matches
Mail list logo
