Hi,
On 19/12/15 22:35, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:27:48 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> Source: libkface
>> Severity: normal
>> Hello,
>> Is there good reason for not having libkface in Unstable ?
New libs tend to be unstable till they are actually used.
> Ditto! :-)
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:27:48 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Source: libkface
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there good reason for not having libkface in Unstable ?
Ditto! :-)
I'm preparing digikam 4.14 for upload to unstable; kface is one of the
optional libraries that I'd like to be
Source: libkface
Severity: normal
Hello,
Is there good reason for not having libkface in Unstable ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures
3 matches
Mail list logo