On 22/10/15 01:48, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 22-10-15 00:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 21/10/15 21:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 21-10-15 21:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 18/10/15 16:38, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Despite only marking the packages relying on
On 22-10-15 00:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 21/10/15 21:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 21-10-15 21:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 18/10/15 16:38, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Despite only marking the packages relying on C++ symbols as bad, I think
all affected reverse
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 21/10/15 21:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 21-10-15 21:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 18/10/15 16:38, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>>> GDAL 1.11.3 as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> GDAL 2.
On 21-10-15 21:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/10/15 16:38, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>> GDAL 1.11.3 as soon as possible.
>>
>> GDAL 2.0.1 was released along with 1.11.3 but several reverse dependencies
>> still need p
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.3.html
On 18/10/15 16:38, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
GDAL 1.11.3 as soon as possible.
GDAL 2.0.1 was released along with 1.11.3 but several reverse dependencies
still
6 matches
Mail list logo