On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 09:32 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On 25 April 2016 at 07:51, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >
> > I meant btrfs is going to remain unstable for some time. There'll always be
> > mixed results reported.
> >
> > We should allow, for the brave, to easily try if they want to.
On 25 April 2016 at 07:51, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> I meant btrfs is going to remain unstable for some time. There'll always be
> mixed results reported.
>
> We should allow, for the brave, to easily try if they want to.
>
> Something like:
>
> rrs@learner:~$ cat /etc/initramfs-tools/hooks/rei
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 07:00 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >> ). I agree that it's probably best to drop the unsafe binary we
> >> currently ship; earlier this year I updated the Debian btrfs wiki to
> >> warn against using it, because of data-loss level bugs mentioned on
> >> the btrfs mailin
Hi Ritesh,
On 16 April 2016 at 04:46, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 21:14 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>
>> As of btrfs-progs-4.4, they're "doing preparatory work for
>> btrfs-convert rewrite" (
>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#btrfs-progs_4.4_.28Jan_20
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 21:14 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> As of btrfs-progs-4.4, they're "doing preparatory work for
> btrfs-convert rewrite" (
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#btrfs-progs_4.4_.28Jan_2016.
> 29
> ). I agree that it's probably best to drop the unsafe bina
On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:03:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 16:49 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>
>> I have considered including it, and had it staged locally. However
>> with recent btrfs/kernels I did not manage to successfully convert
>> ext4 from initramfs =(
>>
>>
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 16:49 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> I have considered including it, and had it staged locally. However
> with recent btrfs/kernels I did not manage to successfully convert
> ext4 from initramfs =(
>
> >
> > If not initramfs, but can you enable a static versio of it?
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 16:26 +0300, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Conversion_from_Ext3
> "Warning: As of 4.0 kernels this feature is not much used or well
> tested anymore, and there have been some reports that the conversion
> doesn't work reliably. Feel free to try
Hello,
On 7 October 2015 at 12:50, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> Package: btrfs-tools
> Version: 4.1.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you think it'd make sense to have btrfs-convert (a static version) in
> the initramfs ?
>
> Because without it, converting an ext4 rootfs to btrfs can be tri
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: btrfs-tools
> Version: 4.1.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you think it'd make sense to have btrfs-convert (a static version) in
> the initramfs ?
>
> Because without it, converting an ext4 rootfs to btrfs can be tricky. B
Package: btrfs-tools
Version: 4.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Do you think it'd make sense to have btrfs-convert (a static version) in
the initramfs ?
Because without it, converting an ext4 rootfs to btrfs can be tricky. By
having it in the initramfs, it should be simple. But apart from the
conve
11 matches
Mail list logo
