Bug#800634: [Pkg-opencl-devel] OpenCL architectures

2016-09-13 Thread Tomasz Rybak
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 10:16 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > This is repost - I've sent this mail last week, but it seems to > disappear. > > There is bug against PyOpenCL to build it for more architectures (in > CC): > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800634 >  Thanks for all the co

Bug#800634: [Pkg-opencl-devel] OpenCL architectures

2016-07-05 Thread Tomasz Rybak
Dnia 2016-07-05 08:08 Andreas Beckmann napisał(a): >On 2016-07-04 10:16, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >> I've checked status of available ICD providers, and: >> * PyOpenCL is built for amd64 and i386 >> * Pocl is built for amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, mips64el, powerpcspe >with the last upload (and the swi

Bug#800634: [Pkg-opencl-devel] OpenCL architectures

2016-07-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2016-07-04 10:16, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > I've checked status of available ICD providers, and: > * PyOpenCL is built for amd64 and i386 > * Pocl is built for amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, mips64el, powerpcspe with the last upload (and the switch to llvm 3.8) this list is down to amd64, i386 :-( and

Bug#800634: [Pkg-opencl-devel] OpenCL architectures

2016-07-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Non-portable packages are required to fail to build on architectures where they can't work ( https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#packages-arch-specific ). A build-dependency automatically does that (e.g. nodejs is arch:any, libv8 isn't), but one can't build-dep